Evidence-Based Medicine
Sepsis in Adults
Background
- The Third International Consensus Definition of Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by dysregulated host response to infection.
- Without timely treatment, sepsis may advance to septic shock, which is defined as vasodilatory hypotension below a mean arterial pressure of 65 mmHg and lactate level > 2 mmol/L (18 mg/dL) despite adequate fluid resuscitation and is associated with increased mortality (> 40%).
- Sepsis occurs when the host response to an infectious pathogen causes life-threatening organ dysfunction, as manifested by
- An increase in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of ≥ 2, which objectively measures function in 6 different domains: pulmonary (oxygen requirements), renal (creatinine), neurologic status (Glasgow Coma Score), coagulation (platelet counts), liver function (bilirubin) and cardiovascular (systolic blood pressure).
- Septic shock, which is a subset of sepsis specifically defined by vasodilatory hypotension below a mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg and lactate level of > 2 mmol/L (18 mg/dL) despite adequate fluid resuscitation.
- Approximately 750,000 cases of sepsis occur annually in the United States.
- Infection with gram-positive organisms appears to be the most common cause of sepsis in the United States with sepsis due to fungal infections on the rise.
Evaluation
- Because organ dysfunction can be measured by an acute change in the total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of ≥ 2 points consequent to presumed infection, patients in whom sepsis is suspected should have measurements to allow calculation of the SOFA score, including vital signs, assessment of neurologic status, complete blood cell count, basic metabolic panel, and a hepatic function panel.
- The quick SOFA score (qSOFA), comprised of a respiratory rate of ≥ 22 per minute, altered mentation, and systolic blood pressure of ≤ 100 mm Hg was developed to rapidly screen for sepsis without requiring a wait for laboratory studies to be completed. qSOFA may be used at the bedside to identify patients with suspected infection likely to have a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay or to die in the hospital.
- Any patient in whom sepsis is suspected should be evaluated to identify the source of infection, which may include cultures (of blood, urine, CSF, respiratory secretions), rapid viral antigen testing, or imaging studies.
Management
- Rapid delivery of care and frequent patient assessments (often requiring ICU admission) are critical to improving outcomes in patients with sepsis.
- Cornerstones of treatment are:
- early fluid and vasopressors for resuscitation when needed in patients with an elevated lactic acid, altered mental status, or poor urine output
- early broad-spectrum antibiotics targeting likely pathogens
- source control
- Prompt management is key as hospital mortality increases with every 1 hour delay in providing appropriate antibiotics.
- Cornerstones of treatment are:
Published: 13-07-2023 Updeted: 13-07-2023
References
- Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee, Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637, also published in Intensive Care Med 2013 Feb;39(2):165, commentary can be found in
- Martin GS. Sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock: changes in incidence, pathogens and outcomes. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012 Jun;10(6):701-6
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al; The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10, commentary can be found in JAMA 2016 Jul 26;316(4):456
- Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143
- Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al; Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017 Mar;43(3):304