Evidence-Based Medicine

Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Background

  • Triple negative breast cancer is defined as breast cancer that is human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative and estrogen and progesterone hormone receptor (HR) negative. It accounts for 11%-15% of all breast cancers.
  • Traditionally, triple negative disease was associated with basal-like molecular subtype, but it is becoming more apparent that it is a heterogeneous disease that includes a variety of molecular subtypes. These subtypes may impact treatment options and response.
  • Risk factors for triple negative breast cancer include those for any breast cancer. Additionally, younger age, Black or Hispanic race, and genetic mutations (such as BRCA1/2, PALB2, BARD1, RAD51C, RAD51D, FANCC, and FANCM) may increase the risk of triple negative disease.
  • Clinical presentation of triple negative breast cancer is similar to that of other breast cancers, although it may present as a palpable mass more frequently than other subtypes. Breast cancers are most commonly detected on screening mammograms or through evaluations of a palpable mass.
  • Generally, triple negative disease is associated with a poorer prognosis, with higher rates of recurrence and shorter overall survival compared to other subtypes.

Evaluation

  • The diagnosis and workup of triple negative breast cancer is similar to other breast cancers. It generally includes a clinical exam, imaging and is confirmed by a pathological assessment of the biopsy, including the HR and HER2 status of the cancer.
  • In the setting of recurrent or metastatic disease, further testing for biomarkers is indicated to guide decisions on the use of targeted therapies. This includes:
    • BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing (Strong recommendation) to predict benefit from poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapies (such as olaparib or talazoparib)
    • determination of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (Strong recommendation) to predict benefit from immunotherapy
    • assessment for NTRK fusion mutation (Weak recommendation) as presence predicts benefit from larotrectinib or entrectinib therapies
    • microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) testing (Weak recommendation) to predict benefit from pembrolizumab or dostarlimab-gxly therapy
    • tumor mutational burden status as high levels (TMB-H) to predict benefit from pembrolizumab therapy (Weak recommendation)

Management

  • Management of nonmetastatic invasive triple negative breast cancer:
    • Surgical intervention (including lumpectomy or mastectomy) and adjuvant radiation therapy are based on tumor T stage and nodal status.
    • Additional management, including neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, is based on clinical or pathological T stage and nodal status.
      • For adults with early operable breast cancer and other-than-favorable histology (including ductal/no special type, lobular, mixed, micropapillary, or metaplastic):
        • if clinical T stage ≥ 2 or clinical nodal status ≥ 1, offer neoadjuvant systemic therapy (Strong recommendation)
        • if pathological T1-T3 tumor and pathological N0-N1mi (axillary node metastasis ≤ 2 mm)
          • for tumor ≤ 0.5 cm and pathological N0, only consider adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk patients (such as those who are young and have high-grade histology) (Weak recommendation); otherwise, no adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended (Weak recommendation)
          • for tumor ≤ 0.5 cm and pathological N1mi, consider adjuvant chemotherapy (Weak recommendation)
          • for tumor 0.6-1 cm, consider adjuvant chemotherapy (Weak recommendation)
          • for tumor > 1 cm, offer adjuvant chemotherapy (Strong recommendation)
        • if pathological positive nodal disease with ≥ 1 ipsilateral nodal metastases > 2 mm, offer adjuvant chemotherapy (Strong recommendation)
      • For adults with early operable breast cancer and favorable histology (such as adenoid cystic and other salivary carcinomas, secretory carcinoma, or rare low-grade metaplastic histologies including low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma or low-grade fibromatosis-like carcinoma), adjuvant systemic or targeted therapy may be considered if pathologically positive nodal disease is detected (Weak recommendation).
  • Management of metastatic triple negative breast cancer:
    • If bone disease is present, provide bone-modifying agents such as bisphosphonates or denosumab, with calcium and vitamin D supplement (Strong recommendation).
    • Offer chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy until progression or unacceptable toxicity (Strong recommendation).
      • If progression or unacceptable toxicity is present, offer another line of chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy (Strong recommendation). Most patients are candidates for multiple lines of palliative systemic therapy; use shared decision-making at each reassessment to evaluate value of ongoing treatment, risks and benefits of additional chemotherapy, performance status, and patient preferences.
      • If progression occurs and no additional systemic therapy is warranted (based on clinical factors and patient preference), consider continuing supportive care without further cytotoxic therapy (Weak recommendation).

Published: 05-07-2023 Updeted: 05-07-2023

References

  1. Loibl S, Poortmans P, Morrow M, Denkert C, Curigliano G. Breast cancer. Lancet. 2021 May 8;397(10286):1750-1769
  2. Waks AG, Winer EP. Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review. JAMA. 2019 Jan 22;321(3):288-300
  3. Gradishar WJ, Moran M, Abraham J, et al. Breast cancer. Version 8.2021. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. NCCN website (free registration required)

Related Topics